Top 10 Songs To Mark Lobbyist/Mayor Bill Pickering’s Red Bathrobe Encore


We interrupt our deep sleep to update you on the latest efforts by (retired) Major Shamateur* that are “Taking Us For A Ryde” (pun intended) as he persists with a desperate crusade to impose a twin (or more)-towered monstrosity on Ryde’s civic precinct, regardless of what ratepayers think.

This is an inspirational story of determination, focus, ‘world’s best practice’ in dirty politics and a man on a mission to make the world aware of an impending crisis in human rights abuses against property developers. Hugo Halliday, our conflicted but resourceful superstar reporter, threw together this report.

As a lobbyist that’s mainly serviced property developers, Bill Pickering is well aware of the struggles and the discrimination they face on multiple fronts, even when trying to make a valuable contribution to the community – like a high-rise residential tower or 10.

(* For details on why we’ve chosen the ceremonial name of Major Shamateur in this piece refer to the section subtitled ‘As Popular Bowel Cancer: No Local Support? No Worries’)

Picko Picks: Songs To Celebrate A Lobbyist Turned Mayor

We drew upon our global editorial resources to assemble a compilation of songs are most relavant to the personal story of Ryde’s new leader by miscarriage.

In number one spot is a song that carries some sentimental value for Pickering.

Its title, ‘Shamateur’ kicked off an ultra-marathon of rage and malicious dummy spitting by Pickering, angered to be given such an honest one-word character assessment by John Booth, editor of local newspaper, The Weekly Times.

#1 Shamateur

This track by pop-electro group Viola, is titled with the same word the The Weekly Times used to describe lobbyist Bill Pickering in his early days as a councillor. So it has a certain sentimental value. That explains the ‘Shamateur’ part of Pickering’s ceremonial title in today’s article, as part of our conribution to community celebrations. The preceding ‘Major’ acknowledges his military obsession, including saving the planet from an invasion by Shariah Law-abiding aliens, the kind of thing he’ll rants about with remarkable proficiency – with no segue too difficult. In fairness without army analogies or war talk sprinkled throughout his rarely-read blog, it’s hard to imagine he’d want to traverse other topic areas and risk revealing deals or relationships he’s kept under the radar that he thinks no one’s noticed. The lyrics by Viola are cryptic, but those resonating most are: “shamateur, you got what you deserved,” which many decent Ryde people hope they’ll be able to recite to their number one local shamateur, in person, soon.

2. No Lies

An  80s classic by the SOS Band that best represents what the Ryde Community wants from anyone that is given the privilege of leading their city – but from Major Shamateur, it seems sadly, they cannot ever seem to get it. , especially on the issue of the Civic Centre redevelopment fiasco. Only recently, local resident and Newcastle University Professor John Smolders reached the point where he’d had enough of had enough which has become far too personal which ultimately leads to his whole campaign for this disaster simply not passing the sniff test.

3. Barbie Girl

Even though Auburn Council media badboy Salim Mehajer has nothing on Major Shamateur, this is the mock video clip made for his notorious wedding celebrations using the tacky Acqua track ‘Barbie Girl’. It has important symbolism for those in solidarity, fighting for property developers’ privacy by not declaring relationships with them.

4. Shut Up

According to the latest available research, this song by The Black Eyed Peas will cross the mind of members of the public gallery at Ryde Council meetings at least once and up to 10 times, during cringeworthy rants by the Major Shamateur.

5. Dirty Cash

This is the ‘Sold Out Mix’ of 90s Stevie V track Dirty Cash – which I’m sure you’ll agree, goes to the heart of why the public does not trust dirty politicians  – especially those who claim they’re powered by god. You’ll especially see the relevance when you hear the words: “I want to get rich quick”.

6. Tacky

When you do one too many dirty political smear campaign and you are a redkneck bogan who puts yourself before the community, you will at some stage be seen as tacky. And Tacky is one of Wierd Al Yankovich’s more recent send up tracks. Perfect.

7. Corrupt

A track with a self-explanatory title, Corrupt was release by electro megastars, Depeche Mode in 2009. Nuff said.

8. Blurred Lines

This Robin Thicke song from 2013, Blurred Lines, is how a corrupt politician would see the hassle of having to reveal dodgy relationships to constituents. Meanwhile, constituents demand they know – there’s nothing blurred or ambiguous about it. If you’re hiding things from them it’s because you know the consequences – in a democracy anyway.

9. Like A Surgeon

Another Wierd Al Yankovich send up, this time of Madonna’s Like A Virgin. It’s a perfect track to help us remember the Shamateur’s staged knock-out – and within 10 minutes of it happening he had sent out a picture of himself, to all media, lying on a paramedics stretcher. He told journos that he expected to stay overnight for observation – but when he got to Ryde hospital, the medical certificate says there was absolutely nothing wrong with him and sent him home with instructions to take a Panadol if his fake pains persisted.

10. Don’t Lie

Another blockbuster from The Black Eyed Peas that reflects exactly what Ryde’s ratepayers collectively think almost every time Major Shamateur delivers his rants at council meetings, in public and (his party colleagues tell us) at caucus meetings – which are kind of naughty under local government legislation in NSW, where you can’t apparently have a binding caucus vote. But without them, how would we ever be able to celebrate the momentus achievements of Bill Pickering – who has made the transition from lobbyist to Mayor? Think about this for a minute – he would be ruthlessly forced into a democratic vote by ratepayers – and as he argues, it’s hard to see why they should have any sort of say in who leads their local administration, right?  yes?  no? (why are you frowning?)

“Bill Pickering rivals both Madonna and Prince when it comes to reinventing himself. His latest incarnation, DJ Picko, has seen him carry on unabated as a truth remixer and ethical illusionist. He brings hope to others that are completely unsuited to public office – for they know they too can now make the grade” – Hugo Halliday


As Popular Bowel Cancer: No Local Support? No Worries

If you’re not into political natter, now’s the time to get off the bus. Or you can hang around and be enlightened.

If there’s something Bill knows well, it’s the unarguable fact that he’s about as popular as bowel cancer and to become “mayor” when you don’t rate a blip in community approval is a big achievement.

He’s employed a simple strategy – make sure Ryde’s ratepayers have no say in it. He fought tooth and nail against a proposal to elect the mayor by popular vote, taking sleazy sanctuary in his more familiar habitat – the dark and dingy backroom.


The closest thing resembling a dark and dingy political caucus meeting scenario where Major Shamateur is most at home

There, he only has to dupe a handful of Liberal caucus members, not an entire community.

And Ryde Council’s meeting  minutes may well report a Mayoral election was carried out in mid-September according to the rules, transparently, in open session. Surely Major Shamateur won fair and square.

Right? Wrong.

The Dastardly Events No One Seems To Have Realised

Don’t forget the dastardly events in the few years leading up to this and his previous shock elevation, used to change numbers on council, which were 7-5 against his shambolic Civic Centre pet project after the 2012 elections.


Major Shamateur has accessed the control panel to fine tune the settings, the meter here indicates his regular output level

There’s been smear campaigning, for which he was embroiled in defamation action;  a disgraceful ICAC inquiry solely to eliminate political rivals and serious conflicts of interests – none of which have been disclosed – leading all the way to Macquarie Street.

Let’s hope some of the misinformation is dealt with when the DPP manages to finally get all the evidence ICAC’s hidden as two innocent men continue to face court over purely fictional claims related to the sham ICAC Ryde inquiry, that don’t pass the sniff test.

Postponing Sour Grapes

For now, we’ve put ruthless abuse of power and misuse of public resources to one side.

We’re here to celebrate Major Shamateur’s latest incarnation, ‘DJ Picko’.

He’s been dazzling large crowds of property developers with his signature “truth remixing” and regular acts of “ethical illusion”.  (Note: pic above from his last gig with imaginary fans).

You can just imagine the ‘Carnivale’ atmosphere that has kicked on in Ryde since Major Shamateur scored the red bathrobes, with celebrations ongoing since mid-September and spilling into the streets.

We’re feeling quite guilty at The Star Chamber Inquirer for getting to the party late, so in the spirit of DJ Picko’s new musical endeavours, we’ve assembled selection of tracks to get things buzzing again.

They’re from his upcoming compilation tribute album ‘Undisclosed’ which included his catchy new track “Help The Starving Children – With High Rise On Ryde’s Waterfront”.

Stay tuned for the fanfare when we launch that brilliant collection of musical artistry very soon.


In NSW, ‘ICAC’ stands for something different

The multimedia effort below clearly informs and wraps up a case study of what has sadly become the rule rather than the exception at ICAC. Its Big Kahunas and Chief Wing-pullers know what their cash cow acronym stands for:


ICAC chooses easy to digest missions, preferably with something salacious to meet their accomplices’ requirements – usually a cheep and nasty headline to impress the masses.

This is the reality. The solution isn’t to kill off the state’s nasty acronym – but rather, those who’ve overstayed the taxpayers’ welcome and contributed to the evolution of  a rotten culture. But who’s going to do that? A federal anti-corruption commission perhaps?

Supervising the abused of state counterparts is yet another compelling reason for a federal watchdog.

Don’t call it “ICAC” though. It shouldn’t be lumbered with the ‘damaged goods’ of the NSW agency’s brand. In fact, the NSW Government should change its name to gauge its underperformance, undisguised by more prolific, effective and better supervised efforts by agencies of the same name*.

(* ICAC in SA and Hong Kong; and the International Crimes Against Children US taskforce)


Almost four long, reputation-smearing years – Jeff Salvestro-Martin finally gets to read a truthful media account of ICAC ordeal

At ICAC you know you’ve made it when, in your hand, you can see the net result of
excessive, unjustifiable use of power, on small, innocent, indefensible creatures.

It’s probably about as good a depiction as any when it comes to gauging the thrill felt among those who pursue flawed investigations within ICAC – using a system of ‘butterfly wing separation’ measurement that’s familiar to its Commissioner Megan Latham, at least.

To be fair though, she stepped into an organisation with an internal culture that began to rot well before she arrived and she needs to stop plucking wings and start clearing out the dead wood around her – because there’s lots.

One simple and unarguable fact: Ryde councillor, Jeff Salvestro-Martin, was dragged through ICAC’s Ryde investigation and public inquiry based on a bungled allegation against six innocent councillors.

Even worse, that bungled allegation was used to strip him of protections from potential reprisals under the Public Interest Disclosure Act due to several referrals of serious, documented and easily provable corruption, ironically involving those it chose to rely on in its evidence – and for those of you who just want that in plain English: ICAC ignored serious, systemic corruption and evidence of it presented in a series of documents, to instead doggedly pursue spurious, vexatious and largely concocted claims by those with a barrow to push.

It has taken a national broadsheet and persistent, experienced and knowledgeable reporting and analysis by The Australian’s legal affairs editor Chris Merritt and senior reporter Sharri Markson to fill the massive void in the Sydney metro media’s coverage of ICAC so you could finally be informed about the unacceptable conduct of the reckless agency.

Often, old and jaded journos will declare themselves worth of the investigative reporter tag – one the had been appropriate in years gone by, but not any more. These are the kind of journos that are letting their newspaper readers down. They are the weakest link and despite media company senior management being constantly accused of diluting the standard of journalism with each and every round of redundancies – the dead wood always seems to escape being cleared out.

It’s these spent cartridges on the editorial floor, easily spotted by their laziness and addiction to rations of ICAC’s magic headline fertiliser, that devalue the media’s important accountability role, relegating it to serve more as ICAC’s insurance against reform.

Ryde councillor Jeff Salvestro-Martin should never have had to endure the public humiliation he was subjected to at the hands of a small clique of corrupt officials whose tendency to resort to personal attacks, dirty tricks, smear campaigns, deception and regular duplicitous behaviour in their dogged pursuit of personal gain at the expense of the communities they supposedly represent, fit the profile of what ICAC is meant to investigate and eliminate.

But beyond simply neglecting their civic duty and responsibility to constituents, those in the clique strayed even further, spectacularly infiltrating decision-making processes of the ICAC, interfering with them and then ultimately using the ICAC as a weapon to eliminate their political rivals and even assume power if they could realise their destructive intent.

It worked a treat. In broad daylight, while everyone simply watched on and apathy anaesthetised the urge to intervene, the clique was easily able to realise what it corruptly set out to achieve.

Despite some obvious hints that something was not right, another three years passed and a still, no one had challenged ICAC’s actions in relation to Ryde.

Surely an ICAC inquiry into six councillors that valiantly fought a controversial twin tower overdevelopment, overwhelmingly opposed by their constituents within the community, was a demonstration of democratic process operating precisely the way it was intended?

And surely a truly independent corruption watchdog would have have no problem identifying those among the six councillors spruiking the redevelopment that had shown clear indications their support for the proposal was fuelled by self-interest?

A corruption watchdog that receives more than 3,000 referrals of corruption each year and time one of its limited resources, would surely reject an in inquiry into the six fighting the development based on it obviously amounting to payback, an abuse of process or vexatious claim?

Surely, just three years after former ICAC Commissioner Ipp sought significant additional funding and carried out an inquiry he cites as one of his legacies, into the risks posed by lobbying and lobbyists, calling on 51 witnesses and handing down 17 recommendations, it would be inappropriate to be led in evidence by a lobbyist/councillor and have his evidence corroborated by his employee, who is also a lobbyist and happens to also be the incumbent Attorney General’s son?

Surely, with the growing pressure over the cases ICAC has been pursuing, it didn’t need a Ryde inquiry in flimsy foundations, if any at all, to exacerbate its woes?

When you swooped to collected Neish’s laptop from Ryde Council premises after learning his office requested the hard drive be formatted – presumably to destroy evidence of his porn downloads – you must’ve had a hunch he was doing something wrong? And not a single mention has been made of it since. Why the determination to conceal this?

If you didn’t know who the bad guys were – either through incompetence or ignorance – perhaps the documented referrals of corruption involving those you’ve entrusted to lead your evidence could have offered a valuable hint.

When you bungled your allegation against the councillors, realised it and quickly removed references to the allegation from public statements, why didn’t you just decide then to let them go as they were being wrongly accused?

Probably the worst thing about the entire Ryde ICAC fiasco – that the agency’s staff, amid a culture of complacency, underperformance, abuse of power, deception and a sense of immunity from the constraints of proper accountability and oversight, had allowed an intrusive and premeditated act of political interference.

They’d shown no sign of dissent, but rather, cooperation to the point they were collaborators, even partners, in this criminal enterprise.

Stay tuned.

Is this too little too late for someone that endured smear and innuendo enabled by an underperforming ICAC and underperforming Fourth Estate.Too little too late? Smear campaign facilitated by underperforming ICAC and failing Fourth Estate?


Leading Media Commentator On ICAC Analyses The Reckless Watchdog’s Actitions And The Implications For Accountability

Once upon a time, journalists would be regarded as experts when they managed to get a *nudge nudge, wink wink* leak from an investigative body, without rule of evidence, like the ICAC.

In truth, leaks of information of unverifiable accuracy should be of concern to journalists. All they do is create a catalyst for laziness and neglect of the fundamental role of a reporter, to scrutinise, expose, analyse and educate their audience on issues.

Even worse, journalists with egocentric motives and a desire to maintain their often dubiously-earned reputations become ideal targets for grooming by ICAC figures that have worked out that headlines and sensationalism blur the goalposts of performance and expectations.

By settling on a compliant handful of reporters for their leaks, ICAC knows the pressure to “do the right thing” if they want more ICAC goodies is a winning strategy.

It allows its often inaccurate and misleading allegations and narratives to go unchallenged, without – or at most, with a disingenuous attempt at – scrutiny.

So when ICAC’s rotten internal culture starts to affect the quality, frequency  and motivations for its inquiries, journalists can find themselves unintentionally peddling creative concoctions simply designed to shore up the reputation of an underperforming agency.

When a reckless agency like ICAC comes under fire from sections of the media driven by accountability of the government and the public right to know, the ICAC-aligned journalists and their associated mastheads find themselves playing the role of apologist.

The absurdity of a journalist with the title of “investigative journalist” that steadfastly refuses to investigate or write on alleged internal corruption at ICAC, including tampering of evidence, political interference, suppression of exculpatory and other enlightening evidence, is now a reality.

The Australian’s legal affairs editor, Chris Merritt, doesn’t need ICAC handouts of little or questionable accuracy to be at the top of his game.

In recent years, as media organisations shed staff en masse  and investigative resources become thin on the ground, Chris’ dedication and attention to detail has produced industry-leading reporting on ICAC.

NSW taxpayers and other interested observers are the beneficiaries. They can now access information in the public domain that includes details of ICAC’s worsening performance, maladministration and wasteful inquiries.

Chris Merritt’s columns have become a compelling read – here’s one of them.

#auspol #nswpol #auslaw #nswlaw #ICAC @australian @smh @dailytelegraph

Who Provoked The Incident Which Left Pickering In The Putney Petunias After Alleged Punch?


This is the provocative flyer circulated by Ryde’s Bill Pickering in the lead up to last week’s Ryde by-election.

Save Ryde did attempt to include a photo of the flyer in a previous post titled Bill Pickering Should Be Knocked Out Of Politics but it was a little hard to read.

Now you can read it in all its glory.

Think back to the TV reports of the incident, where the only witnesses were Liberal Party factional colleagues.

Now take a guess which of the pair would have accused the other of being corrupt.

Puts a spanner in the works doesn’t it? Given the Liberals caustic relationship with Tagg, who defected from the Party to become am independent, there’s a good chance the whole kerfuffle was a stitch-up!

Bill Pickering Should Be Handed The Robes: Not Mayoral, but Papal

Cr Bill Pickering of Ryde in the Papal RObes

Cr Bill Pickering of Ryde in the Papal Robes

Rarely can a few paragraphs of text move someone to shed a tear or two, but a letter to the Northern District Times on July 9th, 2014 certainly did. I’m told the author was a fellow member of  Cr Pickering’s Liberal Party branch, but have not been able to confirm this as yet.

That letter gave me a new perspective on Cr Pickering and the hero status he enjoys within his own party. Don’t take my word for it, have a read for yourself…….

Proof - Cr Pickering's Popularity Within His Party

Proof – Cr Pickering’s Popularity Within His Party

The letter was a response to one sent in by Cr Pickering (below) and generously published by the Northern District Times in which he rattles off an extensive list of achievements as councillor.

Cr Pickering Lauds Cr Pickering - NDT, 2nd July, 2104

Cr Pickering Lauds Cr Pickering – NDT, 2nd July, 2104

Let’s have a look at what he has to say. In a letter titled “It’s time to move forward”, Cr Pickering has a crack at all and sundry with a competing view of reality. He rattles off a list of achievements connected to the political quagmire of the last twelve months and you have to say, it’s extremely impressive, given that he would have had to balance all those things with the mundane kind of stuff councillors are expected to do, like advocate for better traffic outcomes, open space, recreational land use, red tape on local business.

“I stood with former Liberal mayo Artin Etmekdjian in achieving a Supreme Court Injunction against attempts to illegally sack the former General Manager, John Neish,” Cr Pickering writes.

What a stunning achievement that was – at an estimated cost of more than $300,000 for ratepayers. I’m sure residents would be delighted at that sort of expenditure, especially those among the 3,000-plus that objected to the shambolic Civic precinct plan.

The ICAC “findings” against Cr Petch and a local businessman mentioned in Cr Pickering’s letter may seem sinister, but don’t really amount to much – just an allegation, a bit of mud throwing, an attempt at smear.

Run this sham ICAC Ryde inquiry through a common law filter – with proper rules of evidence – and you end up with……… a lot of questions!

“I defended and continue to defend the actions of John Neish, who as a whistleblower suffered unfairly at the hands of councillors now found to be corrupt,” Cr Pickering asserts.

Touching words there by Cr Pickering and he must have a different version of the report. Neish suffered at the hands of “councillors” – plural – you say? There’s only one councillor I can see in the report that was slapped with unfair “corruption” findings. Where is the other? Were you working with a draft copy that no one was privy to?

Just for housekeeping – only one whistleblower suffered unfairly and it wasn’t Neish. We should hear more on this soon.

Cr Pickering  says he “pushed hard” for the ICAC inquiry? What exactly did Cr Pickering do to “push hard” – who did he speak to, what real evidence did he provide, what political favours did he call on? Tell us all about it Cr Pickering, or is that all part of the uninteresting detail?

Finally, Cr Pickering’s letter took the opportunity to put the boot into Ivan Petch again. But I want to know when Cr Pickering plans to thank and honour Cr Petch for giving him a leg up, a “break”, in politics. The pic below shows Cr Pickeing – appropriately on the far right – revelling in his 2008 Ryde candidacy on Ivan Petch’s ticket.



ICAC Revelations Bring Opportunity To Right Ryde Wrongs

Recent ICAC action triggered by factional pitch battle within the NSW Liberal Party has delivered some good news for the people of NSW – Greg Smith has at last been dumped as Attorney General.

And the tactics of the Liberal Right have been exposed, providing a fresh opportunity to address the monumental mistakes of the Ryde inquiry.

Dumped NSW Attorney General Greg Smith.

Former NSW Attorney General Greg Smith (dumped April 2014) with his fans, singing his way out the ministerial door!

Admittedly, the departure of former NSW Premier Barry O’Farrell was a shocking – most probably avoidable – development. But someone had selectively and strategically leaked information aimed at achieving his demise. most probably the Liberal Right.

Premier, Mike Baird, made an immediate, necessary, overdue change – dumping Greg Smith as Attorney General, the portfolio which oversees ICAC.

Somehow, under his watch, the ICAC made some strange operational decisions, most notably pursuing the wrong group of councillors in its Ryde inquiry and seriously bungling information disseminated through public statements and somehow leaked to media prior to the start of the inquiry.

Locals in Smith’s Epping electorate showed him what they thought of him, giving him a bucketing at a recent community meeting, but rather than cop it sweet, Smith proceeded to lecture them. Yet another indication of the ‘born to rule’ mentality of his ‘Religious’ Right factional grouping.

Among the spectacular details reported from ICAC’s latest hearings into the dodgy activities of the Liberal Party was evidence the Liberal Right was more than happy to find ways to wash large illegal donations, with sham companies identified as the vehicle of preference.

Also aired in the inquiry were ‘Black Ops’ activities including midnight missions to rip down posters of political opponents and the practice of vexatious whistleblowing through ICAC by the Liberal Right for the purpose of destroying political opponents and others that get in the way of them making a dodgy earn.

The vexatious whistleblowing allegedly attempted by the Liberal Right’s Chris Hartcher’s office targeting Sydney’s Water’s Kerry Schott, didn’t quite work out.

But vexatious whistleblowing was used in the Ryde inquiry by a Liberal Right clique, with devastating effect. And now that ICAC has tangible evidence of the Liberal Right’s disregard for process, fairness and the law – it should retrace its footsteps with its Ryde inquiry and consider the Liberal Right’s actions to hoodwink it into targeting the wrong Ryde councillors.

We were reminded too that ICAC should have known better and stayed away from the likes of Pickering.

The SMH again reported on the conflicted web of relationships within the Liberal Right clique and reminded readers of Ryde pro-Civic Centre redevelopment councillor Bill Pickering and his mainly-developer lobbying links, close ties with Energy Minister Anthony Roberts, dumped Attorney General Greg Smith and his lobbyist son Nathaniel, who is employed by Pickering.


Bill Pickering wallowing in the mud again

SMH Infographic on Murky Political web feat Bill Pickering – a lobbyist who amazingly, is also a Ryde councillor and employs the son of former NSW Attorney General Greg Smith, Nathaniel, who’s also a lobbyist/councillor at Kogarah. Where does ICAC stand on this ethical conundrum?

In other news, ICAC’s latest foray into political shenanigans by the Liberal Party, has claimed hard-working NSW Upper House MP Marie Ficarra.

In fact, Ficarra has been treated quite shoddily by Counsel Assisting Geoffrey Watson. She has had to step aside until ICAC’s Operation Spicer concludes and the NSW Liberal leadership considers any fallout.

There is little chance of ICAC’s smears going to court to be dealt with under proper rules of evidence and so realistically, a criminal conviction from ICAC’s mudslinging is almost impossible.

When it suits ICAC, it seems to accept versions of events from property developers and lobbyists that align with their own favourite version of events. But to dismiss and mock Ms Ficarra’s explanation of events just because its not what they’d like to hear, is disgraceful.

To accept the proposition that a developer was tricked into handing over money for something he didn’t want is laughable. ICAC should talk to a few tradesman and hear their experiences with developers, who don’t hand over

When ICAC summons a witness to a compulsory examination, it gives no notice of what it plans to ask questions about giving the witness no opportunity to be prepared with information references for accuracy’s sake. Instead, the witness must rely on his or her recollection and this opens the opportunity for memory lapses and the potential to mix-up similar events.

Does ICAC have a recording of Ms Ficarra saying what it has decided it thinks she said? No

Well then, does ICAC have a recording of developer Tony Merhi saying to Ms Ficarra what he claimed in his evidence to ICAC?

That Ms Ficarra has amended her evidence suggests her desire to provide an accurate account and nothing else.

The sooner Ms Ficarra – who is probably the only truly talented and experienced MP left in the Liberal Right – can return to her job, the better for her party and the people of NSW.

The latest casualty in connection to the ICAC probe was Newcastle Liberal MP Tim Owen who decided to cut short his political careers. He topped short of falling on his sword immediately, but said he would not contest the 2015 election because it “appears highly likely” that prohibited donors “did contribute in some way to my election campaign” without his knowledge.